oh lodry where to start, well hmmm the topic was world hunger and the group was made up of 3 girls two of which i thought i knew well. turns out i didn't know one of them well enough. she never went to meetings and would always claim she had some sort of hall meeting or something or another, but in the end when we presented she ended up looking alright and i did 90% of the research and she just took the slides and read them verbatim. Thank god for the other group member because she helped out alot and picked up any of my slack.
Being a senior and all has huge expectations of what one brings to a group. But that does not mean that the senior will do the work the other members dint do. for example my room mate has had a horrible experience when working in a group she is a senior and one was a freshman, and 2 sophomores. They treated her like a slave lady and she being the nice introverted lady she is she complied.
equal distribution of roles and tasks is my ultimate dream of the perfect group project. At the beginning everyone is assigned there part which is as equally as difficult as the others and we go from there and have meetings set and talk about our progress at each meeting and give each other constructive criticism and put the project together
Roles of a group,
well i think it might be a mistake to actually give a single person the role of the leader just because each person has to have a little bit of leader like qualities. but maybe roles such as well you know what I'm not sure i just like to talk between each other and each person picks what they would like to do so that would be there title name. for example if i picked the source 1, 2, and 3 ethos pathos and logos research that would be my title, if a fellow group member picked source 2 background research that would be there title...get my drift?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment